Federal Cases, Dockets, and Filings From U.S. District Courts and U.S. Courts of Appeal
Cases 5,771 - 5,780
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2026cv00490
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 8 U.S.C. § 1105 (a) Aliens: Habeas Corpus to Release INS Detainee
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2026cv04221
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 fd Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Flores Flores v. ICE et al
as 4:2026cv01166
Plaintiff:
Johel Alejandro Flores Flores
Defendant:
ICE and Greene County Jail
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
In re Philip M. Lawrence, II
as 2:2026cv05879
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 0158 Notice of Appeal re Bankruptcy Matter (BAP)
Evans v. Avon Trucklines Inc et al
as 1:2026cv01295
Plaintiff:
Donyuana E Evans
Defendant:
Avon Trucklines Inc and Kiranjeet S Gill
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Personal Injury
Gallegos v. Davidson et al
as 5:2026cv01296
Plaintiff:
Marcus Roger Gallegos
Defendant:
John Davidson and Cameron Wayne Brockman
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2026cv00273
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Robinson v. Williams et al (INMATE 1)
as 2:2026cv00602
Plaintiff:
Cordon M. Robinson
Defendant:
Warden Williams, Yes Care and Steven T. Marshall
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lange v. Department of Corrections et al
as 3:2026cv00276
Plaintiff:
Tayna Lange
Defendant:
Department of Corrections, Johnathan Barcus and Dan Bennett
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Smith v. Smith et al
as 4:2026cv00752
Plaintiff:
Louis Smith, IV
Defendant:
Autumn R Smith, Shad Foley, Logan Leija and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
