Federal Cases, Dockets, and Filings From U.S. District Courts and U.S. Courts of Appeal
Cases 6,181 - 6,190
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2026cv06105
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2026cv02466
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2026cv02470
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2026cv02478
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Newman v. Perez et al
as 2:2026cv00908
Plaintiff:
L. Michael Newman
Defendant:
Luke Perez and Christopher Green
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Nyembwe v. Favor et al
as 2:2026cv00912
Plaintiff:
Danny Nyembwe
Defendant:
Shala Favor, Kimberly Smith, Director Charles Spinning and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2026cv00275
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Clarke v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 2:2026cv00907
Interested Party:
SSA
Plaintiff:
Kenvin Clarke
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
M. v. Red Roof Franchising, LLC et al
as 2:2026cv00911
Plaintiff:
M. A. M.
Defendant:
Red Roof Franchising, LLC and CMOTAM LLC d/b/a Red Roof Inn Baltimore Northwest
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Personal Injury
Lopez v. White et al
as 3:2026cv00750
Plaintiff:
Victor Manuel Lopez
Defendant:
R. White and T. Darden
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
