Federal Cases, Dockets, and Filings From U.S. District Courts and U.S. Courts of Appeal
Cases 7,711 - 7,720
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2026cv03122
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
SILVA v. TE CONNECTIVITY CORPORATION et al
as 2:2026cv08320
Defendant:
JOHN AND JANE DOES 1-30, TE CONNECTIVITY INVESTMENT COMMITTEE, TE CONNECTIVITY RETIREMENT ADMINISTRATIVE COMMITTEE and others
Plaintiff:
ARTURO SILVA
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001 E.R.I.S.A.: Employee Retirement
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2026cv12756
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans With Disabilities Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2026cv27713
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12182 Americans with Disabilities Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2026cv02682
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petiti
Strike 3 Holdings, LLC v. Doe
as 2:2026cv07015
Defendant:
John Doe
Plaintiff:
Strike 3 Holdings, LLC
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101 Copyright Infringement
Strike 3 Holdings, LLC v. Doe
as 2:2026cv07016
Defendant:
John Doe
Plaintiff:
Strike 3 Holdings, LLC
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101 Copyright Infringement
Strike 3 Holdings, LLC v. Doe
as 2:2026cv07017
Defendant:
John Doe
Plaintiff:
Strike 3 Holdings, LLC
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101 Copyright Infringement
Strike 3 Holdings, LLC v. Doe
as 2:2026cv07019
Defendant:
John Doe
Plaintiff:
Strike 3 Holdings, LLC
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101 Copyright Infringement
FRIEL v. BISIGNANO
as 2:2026cv08311
Defendant:
FRANK BISIGNANO
Plaintiff:
BRIAN FRIEL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
