Federal Cases, Dockets, and Filings From U.S. District Courts and U.S. Courts of Appeal
Cases 1,001 - 1,010 of 10,000
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2026cv04717
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2026cv04719
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2026cv04751
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 8 U.S.C. § 1105 (a) Aliens: Habeas Corpus to Release INS Det
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2026cv04755
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2026cv00479
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 8 U.S.C. § 1105 (a) Aliens: Habeas Corpus to Release INS Det
Cypresswood Solutions, LLC v. Google LLC
as 7:2026cv00279
Plaintiff:
Cypresswood Solutions, LLC
Defendant:
Google LLC
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement
Maile v. Bisignano
as 2:2026cv00693
Plaintiff:
Lopeti Maile
Defendant:
Frank Bisignano
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 0205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2026cv00252
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 8 U.S.C. § 1446 Petition for Naturalization Hearing
System Won, Inc. v. Bardell
as 1:2026cv02242
Plaintiff:
System Won, Inc.
Defendant:
Leamm Neary Bardell
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Gustafson v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.
as 3:2026cv00721
Plaintiff:
Keith Gustafson
Defendant:
Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Notice of Removal
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
