Federal Cases, Dockets, and Filings From U.S. District Courts and U.S. Courts of Appeal
Cases 2,751 - 2,760 of 10,000
Betancourth v. Martino Landscape Contractors, Inc. et al
as 7:2026cv06692
Plaintiff:
Darwin Betancourth
Defendant:
Martino Landscape Contractors, Inc. and Leonardo Martino
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 020
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2026cv06322
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2026cv02265
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2026cv01697
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Americans with Disabilities Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2026cv02003
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2026cv02021
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2026cv02301
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Burgo v. Ruiz et al
as 3:2026cv01983
Plaintiff:
Michael Shane Burgo, Jr.
Defendant:
Sgt. Ryan Ruiz, Lt. Jamie Manucy, Michael Brown and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Murzike v. Moats et al
as 3:2026cv02004
Plaintiff:
James T. Murzike
Defendant:
Sgt. Moats, L Padgett, C. Miller and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lumpkin v. Osceola County Sheriff Department of Florida
as 6:2026cv01701
Petitioner:
Nasedra Kenon Lumpkin
Respondent:
Osceola County Sheriff Department of Florida
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
