Federal Cases, Dockets, and Filings From U.S. District Courts and U.S. Courts of Appeal
Cases 2,461 - 2,470
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2026cv14579
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Jane Doe PNA (C.B.) v. Uber Technologies Inc et al
as 3:2026cv13539
Defendant:
Rasier LLC, Rasier CA - LLC and Uber Technologies Inc
Plaintiff:
Jane Doe PNA (C.B.)
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
Warren v. MetLife Disability Insurance Company
as 3:2026cv13537
Defendant:
MetLife Disability Insurance Company
Plaintiff:
juliette warren
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1001 E.R.I.S.A.
Lee
as 3:2026cv13547
Plaintiff:
David D. Lee
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78 m(a) Securities Exchange Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2026cv03218
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2026cv03951
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Australian Tea Masters LLC et al v. Stripe, LLC
as 3:2026cv13538
Plaintiff:
Australian Tea Masters Association Pty. Ltd. and Australian Tea Masters LLC
Defendant:
Stripe, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Jane Doe PNA (M.G.) v. Uber Technologies Inc et al
as 3:2026cv13540
Defendant:
Rasier LLC, Rasier CA - LLC and Uber Technologies Inc
Plaintiff:
Jane Doe PNA (M.G.)
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2026cv05999
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 in - Habeas Corpus: INS
Trujillo v. Meta Platforms, Inc. et al
as 0:2026cv04773
Defendant:
Google LLC, YouTube, LLC, TikTok, LLC and others
Plaintiff:
Martin Trujillo
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
