Federal Cases, Dockets, and Filings From U.S. District Courts and U.S. Courts of Appeal
Cases 3,171 - 3,180
Javid v. Doyle Security Services, Inc.
as 2:2026cv06002
Plaintiff:
Khurram Javid
Defendant:
Doyle Security Services, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
Estepa v. Bisignano
as 1:2026cv05999
Plaintiff:
Pamela M. Estepa
Defendant:
Frank Bisignano
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
HOPKINS v. BOEHRINGER INGELHEIM PHARMACEUTICALS, INC. et al
as 2:2026cv07460
Plaintiff:
GREGORY HOPKINS
Defendant:
BOEHRINGER INGELHEIM PHARMACEUTICALS, INC., SANOFI-AVENTIS U.S. LLC, SANOFI US SERVICES INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
TAYLOR et al v. CLEARA, LLC
as 2:2026cv07456
Plaintiff:
RYAN MICHAEL TAYLOR and JUAN GONZALEZ
Defendant:
CLEARA, LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2026cv03643
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2026cv03640
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Tabaldo v. Michilli Inc.
as 3:2026cv11041
Plaintiff:
Humero Tabaldo
Defendant:
Michilli Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Employment Discrimination
Williams v. UZB Freight, Inc. et al
as 4:2026cv00292
Plaintiff:
Joel Williams
Defendant:
UZB Freight, Inc. and Tolib Nematov
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Notice of Removal - Motor Vehicle
Capehart v. Broce
as 4:2026cv00291
Plaintiff:
Randy Lee Capehart
Defendant:
Candice L. Broce
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2026cv08462
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 ed Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
