Federal Cases, Dockets, and Filings From U.S. District Courts and U.S. Courts of Appeal
Cases 3,621 - 3,630
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 9:2026cv00503
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 8 U.S.C. § 1105 (a) Aliens: Habeas Corpus to Release INS Det
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2026cv01849
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2026cv04262
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2026cv01844
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2026cv02020
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Bussey v. Dotson et al
as 7:2026cv00543
Petitioner:
Jeffery Lynn Bussey, Jr.
Respondent:
Chadwick Dotson and Rick Alsbrook
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Collins v. Alsbrook et al
as 7:2026cv00550
Plaintiff:
Aaron R. Collins
Defendant:
Colonel Rick Alsbrook, Major Todd Tatum, Lt. Montgomery and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Cooper v. Landry
as 7:2026cv00544
Plaintiff:
Thad G. Cooper
Defendant:
A. Landry
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Shenzhen MYIR Electronics Technology Co Ltd v. Hu
as 2:2026cv02375
Plaintiff:
Shenzhen MYIR Electronics Technology Co Ltd doing business as MYIR
Defendant:
Yuxiu Hu
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Declaratory Judgment
Nan v. Blanche
as 26-1805
Petitioner:
JUN NAN and HUASHU JIN
Respondent:
TODD BLANCHE, ACTING UNITED STATES ATTORNEY GENERAL
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
