Federal Cases, Dockets, and Filings From U.S. District Courts and U.S. Courts of Appeal
Cases 3,581 - 3,590
SCHWEINSBERG v. ECKERT SEAMANS CHERIN & MELLOT, LLC
as 2:2026cv02141
Plaintiff:
ROBERT SCHWEINSBERG
Defendant:
ECKERT SEAMANS CHERIN & MELLOT, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Other
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2026cv02115
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2026cv01919
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Pretrial Detainee)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2026cv01920
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Pretrial Detainee)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2026cv26828
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12182 Americans with Disabilities Act
Ancheta v. Federal Express Corporation
as 3:2026cv00731
Plaintiff:
Angelo Ancheta
Defendant:
Federal Express Corporation
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2 (a) Fair Labor Standards Act
Nielson v. Federal Express Corporation
as 3:2026cv00732
Plaintiff:
David Nielson
Defendant:
Federal Express Corporation
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2 (a) Fair Labor Standards Act
Patterson v. Federal Express Corporation
as 3:2026cv00733
Plaintiff:
Raymond Patterson
Defendant:
Federal Express Corporation
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2 (a) Fair Labor Standards Act
Ramirez v. Federal Express Corporation
as 3:2026cv00734
Plaintiff:
Juan Ramirez
Defendant:
Federal Express Corporation
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2 (a) Fair Labor Standards Act
Smith v. Federal Express Corporation
as 3:2026cv00739
Plaintiff:
David Lyle Smith
Defendant:
Federal Express Corporation
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2 (a) Fair Labor Standards Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
