Federal Cases, Dockets, and Filings From U.S. District Courts and U.S. Courts of Appeal
Cases 3,751 - 3,760
Marshall v. Federal Express Corporation
as 1:2026cv04019
Plaintiff:
Latisha Corethia Marshall
Defendant:
Federal Express Corporation
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Webb v. Federal Express Corporation
as 8:2026cv04022
Plaintiff:
Esceo Webb
Defendant:
Federal Express Corporation
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Richards v. Federal Express Corporation
as 8:2026cv04023
Plaintiff:
Vincent Oniel Richards
Defendant:
Federal Express Corporation
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Caslow v. Federal Express Corporation
as 1:2026cv04031
Plaintiff:
Rodney Caslow
Defendant:
Federal Express Corporation
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Best v. Federal Express Corporation
as 1:2026cv03945
Plaintiff:
Derrick Best
Defendant:
Federal Express Corporation
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Chavis v. Federal Express Corporation
as 1:2026cv04035
Plaintiff:
Cjett Chavis
Defendant:
Federal Express Corporation
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Welch v. Federal Express Corporation
as 1:2026cv04037
Plaintiff:
Dennis Welch
Defendant:
Federal Express Corporation
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Wells v. Federal Express Corporation
as 1:2026cv04039
Plaintiff:
Anthony Wells
Defendant:
Federal Express Corporation
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
McAllister v. Federal Express Corporation
as 1:2026cv04046
Plaintiff:
Jalil McAllister
Defendant:
Federal Express Corporation
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2026cv03261
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
