Federal Cases, Dockets, and Filings From U.S. District Courts and U.S. Courts of Appeal
Cases 3,741 - 3,750
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2026cv05762
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 20 U.S.C. § 1400 IDEA: Individuals With Disabilities Education Act (short title)
Fishon v. Bisignano
as 2:2026cv04062
Plaintiff:
Jesse Fishon
Defendant:
Frank Bisignano
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2026cv01368
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2026cv01364
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2026cv00541
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2026cv00540
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Interested Party:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
SCHULMANN v. CONRAD et al
as 1:2026cv00648
Plaintiff:
MONICA SCHULMANN
Defendant:
ROBERT J. CONRAD, ERIC KOMITEE, MARGO K. BRODIE and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
DEAL v. WAL-MART STORES, INC.
as 2:2026cv01461
Plaintiff:
ANTHONY DEAL
Defendant:
WAL-MART STORES, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal-Personal Injury
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2026cv01900
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (IMMIGRATION)
Russaw v. Drost et al
as 1:2026cv01901
Plaintiff:
JhaJuan Russaw
Defendant:
C.O. Drost, C.O. Labore, C.O. Bulick and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
