Federal Cases, Dockets, and Filings From U.S. District Courts and U.S. Courts of Appeal
Cases 3,861 - 3,870
Miles v. Federal Express Corporation
as 2:2026cv00245
Plaintiff:
Gordon Miles
Defendant:
Federal Express Corporation
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Morris v. Federal Express Corporation
as 1:2026cv02783
Plaintiff:
Travis Morris
Defendant:
Federal Express Corporation
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Cischke v. Federal Express Corporation
as 2:2026cv00246
Plaintiff:
Marvin Cischke
Defendant:
Federal Express Corporation
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2026cv05792
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2026cv02746
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Lawrence v. Federal Express Corporation
as 1:2026cv02772
Plaintiff:
Tina Lawrence
Defendant:
Federal Express Corporation
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Hart v. Federal Express Corporation
as 1:2026cv02748
Plaintiff:
Rick Hart
Defendant:
Federal Express Corporation
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Abuarqub v. DOT Foods Inc., et al.
as 5:2026cv02566
Plaintiff:
Mohammad Abuarqub
Defendant:
DOT Foods Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Motor Vehicle Product Liability
Yarbrough v. United Healthcare Services, Inc.
as 3:2026cv02562
Plaintiff:
Stephanie Yarbrough
Defendant:
United Healthcare Services, Inc. doing business as UMR
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2026cv03681
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
