Federal Cases, Dockets, and Filings From U.S. District Courts and U.S. Courts of Appeal
Cases 4,191 - 4,200
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2026cv05489
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 8 U.S.C. § 1105 (a) Aliens: Habeas Corpus to Release INS Det
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2026cv00567
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Domoton VC LP et al v. Polyient Incorporated et al
as 2:2026cv04865
Plaintiff:
Domoton VC LP and Derek Rundell
Defendant:
Polyient Incorporated, Bradley Robertson and Andrea Robertson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Declaratory Judgment
Hancock v. Paredes et al
as 2:2026cv04870
Plaintiff:
Jeffrey J Hancock
Defendant:
Miguel Paredes, Prudent Fiduciary Services LLC, Derek F Wright and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1002 E.R.I.S.A.: Employee Retirement
Wilson v. Cook et al
as 3:2026cv00195
Plaintiff:
Bobby Wilson
Defendant:
Dale Cook, McCullum and Heyley Hooton
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Vornes v. Cook et al
as 3:2026cv00198
Plaintiff:
Terrick Vornes
Defendant:
Dale Cook, McCullum and Heyley Hooton
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Pearson v. Cook et al
as 3:2026cv00199
Plaintiff:
Ricky Pearson
Defendant:
Dale Cook, McCullum and Heyley Hooton
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Mathews v. Cook et al
as 3:2026cv00200
Plaintiff:
Marcel Mathews
Defendant:
Dale Cook, McCullum and Heyley Hooton
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2026cv03998
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 fd Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2026cv03992
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 fd Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
