Federal Cases, Dockets, and Filings From U.S. District Courts and U.S. Courts of Appeal
Cases 4,151 - 4,160
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 26-4389
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Brightman, et al. v. Toshiba America Business Solutions, Inc., et al.
as 26-4401
Plaintiff:
JONATHAN BRIGHTMAN and COPY COM DISTRIBUTION, INC., a California Corporation, dba Independent Cartridge Supplier, dba Corporate Products
Defendant:
TOSHIBA AMERICA BUSINESS SOLUTIONS, INC., a California Corporation, TOSHIBA BUSINESS SOLUTIONS, INC. and DOES, 1-10, inclusive
Baxter v. City of Hemet, et al.
as 26-4391
Plaintiff:
DAVID BAXTER, an individual
Defendant:
CITY OF HEMET, a municipality, CHRISTIAN COLEY, an individual, NICHOLAS SCHROEDER, an individual and others
Santos Cheng, et al. v. Yi, et al.
as 26-4402
Plaintiff:
MARIA ELIZABETH SANTOS CHENG and ELOISE MARISSE MICHELLE CHENG SADSAD
Defendant:
SHEILA YI, DALE COLLIER, an individual, G47 GLOBAL INITIATIVE GROUP, a Montana nonprofit corporation and others
Wexler v. Starbucks Corporation, et al.
as 26-4387
Plaintiff:
MARSHALL A. WEXLER
Defendant:
STARBUCKS CORPORATION and WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A.
Sports Rehab Consulting, et al v. Vail Clinic
as 26-1271
Plaintiff:
SPORTS REHAB CONSULTING LLC, a Colorado limited liability company and LINDSAY WINNINGER, an individual
Defendant:
VAIL CLINIC, INC., a Colorado nonprofit corporation, DBA Vail Health
Emrit v. Carpenter, et al
as 26-1270
Plaintiff:
RONALD SATISH EMRIT
Defendant:
SABRINA CARPENTER, as Grammy-Award Winning Recording Artist, THE GRAMMYS RECORDING ACADEMY, KETANJI BROWN-JACKSON, Justice and others
Luis Villagran Campos v. U.S. Attorney General
as 26-12418
Petitioner:
LUIS ARCANGEL VILLAGRAN CAMPOS
Respondent:
U.S. ATTORNEY GENERAL
Lawrence Mendez v. Hung Cao
as 26-5260
Plaintiff:
Lawrence Mendez
Defendant:
Hung Cao, in his official capacity only, as Secretary of the Navy
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
