Federal Cases, Dockets, and Filings From U.S. District Courts and U.S. Courts of Appeal
Cases 4,241 - 4,250
Mendez v. English et al
as 2:2026cv00315
Plaintiff:
Austin Mendez
Defendant:
Brian English, John Doe and Taylor
Unknown:
MIAMI E-FILE(Court Use Only)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ross v. English et al
as 2:2026cv00316
Plaintiff:
Quentin Tyler Ross
Defendant:
Brian English and Kimberly Grandstaff
Unknown:
MIAMI E-FILE(Court Use Only)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
BEEMON v. CITY OF NOBLESVILLE, INDIANA
as 1:2026cv01464
Plaintiff:
DENARD BEEMON
Defendant:
CITY OF NOBLESVILLE, INDIANA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2026cv01466
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petiti
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2026cv03229
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Fountain v. Kansas Star Casino, LLC et al
as 2:2026cv02406
Plaintiff:
Christopher Fountain
Defendant:
Kansas Star Casino, LLC and Boyd Gaming Corporation
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Boggs v. Puckett et al
as 6:2026cv00214
Plaintiff:
Nora Jade Boggs
Defendant:
Timothy Puckett and TP Trucking, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Tort/Motor Vehicle (
Tulu v. Correctional Officers
as 0:2026cv00104
Plaintiff:
Muwsay Ibn Ibrahim Tulu
Defendant:
John Doe Correctional Officers
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Rogers v. SSA
as 0:2026cv00105
Plaintiff:
Penny Michelle Rogers
Defendant:
Commissioner of SSA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
In Re Attorney Admission for David Charles Ahlstrom
as 2:2026aa00013
Unknown:
Attorney Admission Application
Cause Of Action: Civil Miscellaneous Case
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
