Federal Cases, Dockets, and Filings From U.S. District Courts and U.S. Courts of Appeal
Cases 4,831 - 4,840
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2026cv05002
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 in - Habeas Corpus: INS
Quezada v. LNU
as 5:2026cv00743
Plaintiff:
Graciano Quezada
Defendant:
FNU LNU
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2026cv03948
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Boudreaux v. Federal Express Corp
as 6:2026cv03958
Plaintiff:
Darrell Boudreaux
Defendant:
Federal Express Corp
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2 (a) Fair Labor Standards Act
Johnson v. Federal Express Corporation
as 3:2026cv01072
Plaintiff:
Kiara Johnson
Defendant:
Federal Express Corporation
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2 (a) Fair Labor Standards Act
Casto v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 2:2026cv01273
Plaintiff:
Shawn Edward Casto
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Activemap LLC v. Tractor Supply Company
as 2:2026cv00907
Plaintiff:
Activemap LLC
Defendant:
Tractor Supply Company
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement
Activemap LLC v. Warby Parker Retail, Inc.
as 2:2026cv00905
Plaintiff:
Activemap LLC
Defendant:
Warby Parker Retail, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2026cv01785
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Dunphy v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2026cv01017
Interested Party:
SSA
Plaintiff:
Katie Dunphy
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
