Federal Cases, Dockets, and Filings From U.S. District Courts and U.S. Courts of Appeal
Cases 4,981 - 4,990
Ezra Smith v. Monique Tracey, et al
as 26-13650
Plaintiff:
EZRA SMITH
Defendant:
MONIQUE TRACEY, SHENEQUA JACKSON and RAUL GOMEZ
Unknown:
SERVICE
Carl Wilson v. Broward Sheriff Office Detention Facility
as 26-13630
Plaintiff:
CARL WELL WILSON
Defendant:
BROWARD COUNTY JAIL
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2026cv01813
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 8 U.S.C. § 1105 (a) Aliens: Habeas Corpus to Release INS Det
Smith v. Federal Express Corporation
as 3:2026cv01315
Plaintiff:
Terrence Smith
Defendant:
Federal Express Corporation
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2 (a) Fair Labor Standards Act
Hartley v. USA
as 3:2026cv00855
Petitioner:
Malcolm Jarrel Hartley
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
Jones v. Whittington
as 5:2026cv04191
Plaintiff:
Robert Clinton Jones
Defendant:
Julian Whittington
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Hera Lighting L.P. v. United States
as 1:2026cv04381
Plaintiff:
Hera Lighting L.P.
Defendant:
United States Customs and Border Protection
A.T. Cross Company LLC v. United States et al
as 1:2026cv04374
Plaintiff:
A.T. Cross Company LLC
Defendant:
United States, U.S. Customs and Border Protection and Rodney S. Scott, in his official capacity as Commissioner of U.S. Customs and Border Protection
Safran Electronics & Defense, Avionics USA, LLC v. United States
as 1:2026cv04362
Plaintiff:
Safran Electronics & Defense, Avionics USA, LLC
Defendant:
United States
Sun Pleasure Co. Ltd. v. United States et al
as 1:2026cv04368
Plaintiff:
Sun Pleasure Co. Ltd.
Defendant:
United States, U.S. Customs and Border Protection and Rodney S. Scott, in his official capacity as Commissioner of U.S. Customs and Border Protection
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
