Federal cases, dockets and filings from U.S. District Courts and U.S. Courts of Appeal

Cases filed


Cases 71 - 80
Meghan Creech v. Charles Pater, et al
as 16-4703
Plaintiff - Appellant: MEGHAN CREECH
Defendant - Appellee: CHARLES PATER, DETECTIVE GARY CROUCH
Bon-ing Inc., et al v. Richard Hodges, et al
as 16-4704
Plaintiff - Appellant: BON-ING INC., JENNIE INGRAM CALLOWAY
Defendant - Appellee: RICHARD HODGES, LANCE HIMES
In re: Anthony Ellis
as 16-6781
Movant: In re: ANTHONY ELLIS
Respondent: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
In re: James Harrison
as 16-6782
Petitioner: In re: JAMES N. HARRISON
In re: Jesse Bailey
as 16-6783
Movant: In re: JESSE RONDALE BAILEY
Respondent: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Glenn Hopkins v. Illinois Workers' Compensatio, et al
as 16-4107
Plaintiff - Appellant: GLENN J. HOPKINS
Defendant - Appellee: ILLINOIS WORKERS' COMPENSATION COMMISSION, BRUCE V. RAUNER, CHRISTIAN HOMES, INC. and others
Lawrence Jaffe, et al v. Household International, Inc., et al
as 16-4108
Plaintiff - Appellee: LAWRENCE JAFFE, Pension Plan, on behalf of itself and all others similarly situated, GLICKENHAUS & COMPANY
Appellant: KEVIN P. MCDONALD
Defendant - Appellee: HOUSEHOLD INTERNATIONAL, INC., WILLIAM F. ALDINGER, DAVID A. SCHOENHOLZ and others
William Swanson v. Joseph Hankins, et al
as 16-4109
Plaintiff - Appellant: WILLIAM SWANSON
Defendant - Appellee: JOSEPH HANKINS, Public Service Administrator, SHAN JUMPER, SHARLENE CARAWAY, Assistant Clinical Director and others
Dwayne Sandress v. Illinois Prisoner Review Board, et al
as 16-4110
Petitioner - Appellant: DWAYNE SANDRESS, also known as MICHAEL JOSEPH, N61217
Respondent - Appellee: ILLINOIS PRISONER REVIEW BOARD, NNEKA JONES TAPIA, Director, Executive Director, Cook County Jail
Johnny DeSilva, Jr. v. USA
as 16-4111
Petitioner - Appellant: JOHNNY J. DESILVA, JR.
Respondent - Appellee: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?