Federal Cases, Dockets, and Filings From U.S. District Courts and U.S. Courts of Appeal
Cases 8,321 - 8,330
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2026cv03847
Claimant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Job Discrimination (Race)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2026cv27763
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12182 Americans with Disabilities Act
Hollingsworth v. CSX Corporation
as 3:2026cv03030
Defendant:
CSX Corporation
Plaintiff:
Cory Hollingsworth
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Hartbauer v. NuWave LLC et al
as 5:2026cv00814
Defendant:
QVC Group, Inc. and NuWave LLC
Plaintiff:
Rodney Hartbauer
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Thompson v. Regions Bank
as 3:2026cv03017
Defendant:
Regions Bank
Plaintiff:
James E. Thompson
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1693 Electronic Fund Transfer Act (EFTA)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2026cv03021
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2026cv00815
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Ramos v. Warden, North Florida Detention Center (Baker)
as 3:2026cv03029
Defendant:
WARDEN, BAKER CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION
Plaintiff:
LEONARD BARRERAS RAMOS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Bregu v. Secretary, FL Department of Corrections
as 5:2026cv00817
Respondent:
Secretary, FL Department of Corrections
Petitioner:
Arben Bregu
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2026cv04227
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
