Federal Cases, Dockets, and Filings From U.S. District Courts and U.S. Courts of Appeal
Cases 8,361 - 8,370
Ruiz v. State Farm Lloyds
as 4:2026cv07033
Plaintiff:
Ana Ruiz
Defendant:
State Farm Lloyds
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2026cv07040
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 8 U.S.C. § 1105 (a) Aliens: Habeas Corpus to Release INS Det
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2026cv01494
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Jacklin v. USA
as 3:2026cv01111
Petitioner:
Ryan A. Jacklin
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Pharr v. USA
as 2:2026cv13012
Petitioner:
Andre Pharr
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Wyoming Technology Licensing Inc v. Hyundai Motor America
as 3:2026cv02840
Plaintiff:
Wyoming Technology Licensing Inc
Defendant:
Hyundai Motor America
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2026cv01507
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Sherman v. Payne et al
as 4:2026cv00867
Plaintiff:
Patrick L Sherman
Defendant:
Dexter Payne, Tim Cheek, Chris Budnik and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Other Civil Rights
Jarvis v. Officer C. Adams et al
as 1:2026cv00856
Plaintiff:
Lockhart L. Jarvis
Defendant:
Officer C. Adams, Lt. J. Saggus, Inspector J. Ledford and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2026cv02422
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (IMMIGRATION)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
