Federal Cases, Dockets, and Filings From U.S. District Courts and U.S. Courts of Appeal
Cases 8,441 - 8,450
(PC) Bonilla v. Claire
as 2:2026cv03730
Defendant:
Allison Claire
Plaintiff:
Steven Wayne Bonilla, VEXATIOUS LITIGANT
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Xythonic LLC v. F24 AG
as 2:2026cv00989
Defendant:
F24 AG
Plaintiff:
Xythonic LLC
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2026cv09708
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2026cv03486
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2026cv00962
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2026cv01295
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Bhardwaj v. Corvallis et al
as 6:2026cv02415
Defendant:
Ritwik Nath, Nathan Diebel and City of Corvallis
Plaintiff:
Ritu Bhardwaj
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Harrelson v. Fitch et al
as 2:2026cv00194
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Defendant:
Mario Grady, Matthew Reynolds, Burl Cain and others
Plaintiff:
Jonathan D Harrelson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Salicaceae v. Commissioner Social Security Administration
as 3:2026cv02421
Defendant:
Commissioner Social Security Administration
Plaintiff:
Andromeda Salicaceae
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 0405 g Review of Commissioner's Final Decision
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 7:2026cv00445
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
