Federal Cases, Dockets, and Filings From U.S. District Courts and U.S. Courts of Appeal
Cases 9,891 - 9,900
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2026cv00432
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Diaz v. IAH Field Office Director et al
as 6:2026cv00433
Petitioner:
Dariel Ariel Sabury Diaz
Respondent:
Unknown IAH Field Office Director, Unknown Homeland Security Secretary and Unknown Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Santoyo v. Federal Express Corporation
as 2:2026at01676
Plaintiff:
David Santoyo
Defendant:
Federal Express Corporation
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2 (a) Fair Labor Standards Act
Sargent v. Federal Express Corporation
as 2:2026at01679
Plaintiff:
Zachary Sargent
Defendant:
Federal Express Corporation
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2 (a) Fair Labor Standards Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2026cv10279
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petition
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2026cv14200
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
HAGGOOD v. Macys Retail Holdings, LLC
as 2:2026cv10281
Plaintiff:
PHILLIP HAGGOOD
Defendant:
Macys Retail Holdings, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal - Personal Injury
Ruffalo
as 2:2026cv10283
Petitioner:
Joseph Ruffalo
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity - Legal Malpractice
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2026cv10282
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Employment Discrimination
Varella v. Federal Express Corporation
as 2:2026at01705
Plaintiff:
Raymond Varella
Defendant:
Federal Express Corporation
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2 (a) Fair Labor Standards Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
