Prisoner Petitions Cases
Cases 81 - 90 of 417,147
Rodriguez v. Martinez
as 2:2024cv00535
Plaintiff:
Abraham Salomon Rodriguez
Defendant:
Felipe Martinez, Jr
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Bradley v. Schreiber
as 2:2024cv11065
Petitioner:
Jimmie Lee Bradley, Jr.
Respondent:
Paul Schreiber
Beale v. Huffman
as 3:2024cv00109
Petitioner:
Jerry Beale, Jr.
Respondent:
Brand Huffman
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Moore v. Oliver et al
as 2:2024cv00774
Petitioner:
James Lamont Moore
Respondent:
Warden Oliver and The Attorney General of the State of Nevada
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Rodriguez v. Henley et al
as 3:2024cv00182
Petitioner:
Jeffrey Rodriguez
Respondent:
John Henley and The Attorney General of the State of Nevada
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
McComb v. Marion Correctional Institution, Warden
as 3:2024cv00123
Petitioner:
Damitree McComb
Respondent:
Marion Correctional Institution, Warden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
SHAMRO v. PENNSYLVANIA PAROLE BOARD et al
as 2:2024cv00608
Petitioner:
JOSH SHAMRO
Respondent:
PENNSYLVANIA PAROLE BOARD and SUPERINTENDENT OF SCI MERCER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Goodloe v. Matevousion et al
as 4:2024cv00695
Petitioner:
Ronald E. Goodloe
Respondent:
Andre Matevousion, Warden Thomas E. Bargami and B. Potes
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Webb v. Lumpkin
as 4:2024cv01502
Petitioner:
Everette Dale Webb
Respondent:
Bobby Lumpkin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Yeats v. Dotson
as 3:2024cv00296
Petitioner:
Killian Yeats
Respondent:
Chadwick Dotson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
