Federal Cases, Dockets, and Filings From U.S. District Courts and U.S. Courts of Appeal
Cases 2,271 - 2,280 of 10,000
Linares v. United States of America
as 0:2026cv03575
Petitioner:
Edwin Efrain Portillo Linares
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Barton et al v. Canadian National Railway
as 0:2026cv03572
Plaintiff:
Clifford Barton, Mason Baumgartner, Eric Bertrang and others
Defendant:
Canadian National Railway
Cause Of Action: 49 U.S.C. § 20101 Federal Railroad Safety Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 0:2026cv62207
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 0:2026cv62213
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Paniagua v. American Airlines, Inc.
as 0:2026cv62199
Plaintiff:
Ms. Maria Paniagua
Defendant:
American Airlines, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Personal Injury
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 0:2026cv62210
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
v. Vargas Alban et al
as 0:2026cv62205
Defendant:
Alexander Vargas Alban and LUMIWEALTH, INC
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Barack v. Premier Data Consulting, LLC
as 0:2026cv62211
Plaintiff:
Michael Barack
Defendant:
Premier Data Consulting, LLC
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Barack v. Premier Data Consulting, LLC
as 0:2026cv62212
Plaintiff:
Michael Barack
Defendant:
Premier Data Consulting, LLC
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Merryman v. USA
as 1:2026cv00136
Petitioner:
Robert Blake Merryman
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
