Federal Cases, Dockets, and Filings From U.S. District Courts and U.S. Courts of Appeal
Cases 661 - 670 of 10,000
M. et al v. Blue Cross and Blue Shield of Nebraska, Inc.
as 1:2026cv03313
Plaintiff:
Joanna M. and A. M.
Defendant:
Blue Cross and Blue Shield of Nebraska, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001 E.R.I.S.A.: Employee Retirement
Neal et al v. The Hanover Insurance Company
as 3:2026cv01168
Plaintiff:
David Neal and Jennifer Neal
Defendant:
The Hanover Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Notice of Removal
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2026cv01169
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Notice of Removal
Strike 3 Holdings, LLC v. Doe
as 3:2026cv01161
Plaintiff:
Strike 3 Holdings, LLC
Defendant:
John Doe
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101 Copyright Infringement
Strike 3 Holdings, LLC v. Doe
as 3:2026cv01162
Plaintiff:
Strike 3 Holdings, LLC
Defendant:
John Doe
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101 Copyright Infringement
Strike 3 Holdings, LLC v. Doe
as 3:2026cv01164
Plaintiff:
Strike 3 Holdings, LLC
Defendant:
John Doe
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101 Copyright Infringement
NumberAI, Inc. v. Flai Technologies Inc.
as 1:2026cv00894
Plaintiff:
NumberAI, Inc.
Defendant:
Flai Technologies Inc.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 1 Patent Infringement
STRIKE 3 HOLDINGS, LLC v. DOE
as 1:2026cv02576
Plaintiff:
STRIKE 3 HOLDINGS, LLC
Defendant:
JOHN DOE
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101 Copyright Infringement
STRIKE 3 HOLDINGS, LLC v. DOE
as 1:2026cv02577
Plaintiff:
STRIKE 3 HOLDINGS, LLC
Defendant:
JOHN DOE
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101 Copyright Infringement
REQUEST FOR EXEMPTION FROM ELECTRONIC PUBLIC ACCESS FEES BY HAYLEY MUNIR
as 1:2026mc00110
Unknown:
REQUEST FOR EXEMPTION FROM ELECTRONIC PUBLIC ACCESS FEES BY HAYLEY MUNIR
Cause Of Action: Civil Miscellaneous Case
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
