Federal Cases, Dockets, and Filings From U.S. District Courts and U.S. Courts of Appeal
Cases 991 - 1,000
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2026cv03036
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2026cv00366
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Disability Act of 1990
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2026cv04276
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 in - Habeas Corpus: INS
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2026cv04279
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 in - Habeas Corpus: INS
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2026cv02041
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Neibarger v. Licking Metropolitan Housing Authority et al
as 2:2026cv01131
Plaintiff:
Todd Neibarger
Defendant:
Licking Metropolitan Housing Authority and Bobbie Cotterman
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Fair Housing Act
Greene v. Cintas Corporation
as 1:2026cv00922
Plaintiff:
Michael Greene
Defendant:
Cintas Corporation
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Edwards v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 3:2026cv00344
Interested Party:
SSA
Plaintiff:
Travis Edwards
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
McQuitty v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2026cv00923
Interested Party:
SSA
Plaintiff:
Eric McQuitty
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2026cv05862
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 8 U.S.C. § 1105 (a) Aliens: Habeas Corpus to Release INS Det
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
