Federal Cases, Dockets, and Filings From U.S. District Courts and U.S. Courts of Appeal
Cases 1,631 - 1,640
Ruff v. St. Charles Mercy Health Hospital et al.
as 3:2026cv01427
Plaintiff:
Bobbie Deanna Ruff
Defendant:
St. Charles Mercy Health Hospital, Salija Peddireddy, Michael Bowdler and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2026cv01429
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Jackson v. Hoover
as 1:2026cv01423
Petitioner:
James Jackson
Respondent:
Warden Kenneth Hoover
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Adams v. SumiRiko Ohio, Inc.
as 3:2026cv01431
Plaintiff:
Timmy Adams
Defendant:
SumiRiko Ohio, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Gallegos v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 3:2026cv01420
Plaintiff:
Diane Sue Gallegos
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Kinney v. City of Miamisburg et al
as 3:2026cv00201
Plaintiff:
Darryl Kinney, Sr.
Defendant:
City of Miamisburg and Katherine Merkel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Johnson v. Michelman, Inc.
as 1:2026cv00618
Plaintiff:
Diontye Johnson
Defendant:
Michelman, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Petty v. Capital City Utilities, LLC
as 2:2026cv00756
Plaintiff:
Jordan Petty
Defendant:
Capital City Utilities, LLC
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Marshall v. Social Security Administration
as 4:2026cv00379
Plaintiff:
Patricia M Marshall
Defendant:
Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Tennenbaum v. World Fuel Services Inc
as 5:2026cv01522
Plaintiff:
Michael E Tennenbaum
Defendant:
World Fuel Services Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Other Contract
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
