Federal Cases, Dockets, and Filings From U.S. District Courts and U.S. Courts of Appeal
Cases 2,151 - 2,160
Al Iweer v. Bisignano
as 8:2026cv00564
Plaintiff:
Issam Al Iweer
Defendant:
Frank Bisignano
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Watkins v. Tuck et al
as 3:2026cv01357
Plaintiff:
Erinn D. Watkins
Defendant:
John Tuck and City of Franklin, Tennessee
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 2721 Driver's Privacy Protection Act of 1994
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2026cv01658
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
McKenzie v. Communications Workers of America
as 3:2026cv01655
Plaintiff:
Wesley McKenzie
Defendant:
Communications Workers Of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
Morris v. Federal Express Corporation
as 8:2026cv02901
Plaintiff:
John Morris
Defendant:
Federal Express Corporation
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2026cv01734
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2026cv02890
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Pridgen v. United States of America
as 5:2026hc02164
Petitioner:
Daquan Madrid Pridgen
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2026cv02840
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2003 Job Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2026cv02837
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (IMMIGRATION)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
