Federal Cases, Dockets, and Filings From U.S. District Courts and U.S. Courts of Appeal
Cases 2,401 - 2,410
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2026cv06148
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2026cv02439
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2026cv03762
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2026cv03764
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Aaron Automotive Group v. Utah Tech Labs
as 2:2026cv00890
Plaintiff:
Aaron Automotive Group
Defendant:
Utah Tech Labs LLC doing business as UTL
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Garay v. Doe 1-3
as 1:2026cv01746
Plaintiff:
Rafael Garay
Defendant:
John Doe 1-3
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Strasser v. Bisignano
as 1:2026cv01756
Plaintiff:
Christopher Strasser
Defendant:
Frank Bisignano
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2026cv02635
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Lopez et al v. Hyatt Corporation et al
as 3:2026cv05512
Plaintiff:
Blake Lopez and Jacqueline Lopez
Defendant:
Hyatt Corporation and Does 1-50
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 pi Diversity-Personal Injury
Gamble v. TikTok
as 3:2026cv05500
Plaintiff:
Tyler Gamble
Defendant:
TikTok
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 fr Fed. Question: Fraud
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
