Federal Cases, Dockets, and Filings From U.S. District Courts and U.S. Courts of Appeal
Cases 4,071 - 4,080
Robinson v. Razick
as 1:2026cv02706
Plaintiff:
Maurice Robinson
Defendant:
Idress Razick
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 vp Violation of Due Process and Equal Protection
Gray v. Onyike, MD et al
as 8:2026cv02708
Plaintiff:
Linwood Gray
Defendant:
Ahamefula Onyike, MD and Medstar Orthopedic Inst.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Account Receivable
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2026cv02718
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Habeas Corpus: INS
Castro Hernandez et al v. Mullin et al
as 8:2026cv02712
Plaintiff:
Delia Patricia Castro Hernandez and Wuilian Antonio Argueta Pereira
Defendant:
Elizabeth Grant, Acting Director TODD L LYONS, Ted H Kim and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedures Act
Negron et al v. Bonner et al
as 1:2026cv13159
Plaintiff:
Jose L. Negron
Defendant:
Charlene Bonner, Angelo Gomez Jr., Suzan Colletet and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Cook v. Hawkins et al
as 3:2026cv30108
Plaintiff:
Rachel Cook
Defendant:
James Hawkins and Randy Crochier
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2026cv13153
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2026cv13154
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2026cv40174
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
Ellis v. Artius Health Part of Optum
as 1:2026cv13164
Plaintiff:
Teeisha Murice Ellis
Defendant:
Artius Health Part of Optum
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Other Contract
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.