Federal Cases, Dockets, and Filings From U.S. District Courts and U.S. Courts of Appeal
Cases 4,051 - 4,060
Duering v. Bisignano
as 1:2026cv08100
Plaintiff:
John Duering
Defendant:
Frank Bisignano
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Garcia v. Kelly
as 3:2026cv00938
Plaintiff:
Tina Garcia
Defendant:
Jeannie Kelly
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Auto Negligence
Scipio v. Beech-Nut Nutrition Company et al
as 1:2026cv00320
Plaintiff:
Callie Scipio
Defendant:
Beech-Nut Nutrition Company, The Campbells Company, Danone North America, PBC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Lacey v. Arnold et al
as 1:2026cv00319
Plaintiff:
Jared P Lacey
Defendant:
Lloyd Arnold, Chelsea Foster and the Indiana Department of Correction
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Lahners v. Matwyshyn et al
as 3:2026cv01012
Plaintiff:
Adam Lahners
Defendant:
John Matwyshyn and LaPorte County
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2026cv01014
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2026cv01018
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2026cv01013
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
MURRAY v. COHAN et al
as 1:2026cv01454
Plaintiff:
SAMUEL E. MURRAY
Defendant:
JOHN COHAN and CITY OF INDIANAPOLIS/IMPD
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
DRAKE v. APRIA HEALTHCARE LLC
as 1:2026cv01449
Plaintiff:
BRENDA DRAKE
Defendant:
APRIA HEALTHCARE LLC
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
