Federal Cases, Dockets, and Filings From U.S. District Courts and U.S. Courts of Appeal
Cases 4,011 - 4,020
PENDAS v. SPA WORLD CORPORATION
as 1:2026cv24709
Plaintiff:
FERNANDO PENDAS
Defendant:
SPA WORLD CORPORATION doing business as SWCORP
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 0002 Fair Labor Standards Act
TERRELL v. Best Buy/CBNA
as 9:2026cv80807
Plaintiff:
SEAN TERRELL
Defendant:
CITIBANK, N.A.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
North v. Beech-Nut Nutrition Company et al
as 6:2026cv01470
Plaintiff:
R. H., A MINOR
Defendant:
Beech-Nut Nutrition Company, Gerber Products Company, Nestle USA, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2026cv01756
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2026cv01757
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2026cv01467
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 0702 Administrative Procedure Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2026cv01761
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2026cv01755
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Ditona v. Nutt
as 8:2026cv01916
Plaintiff:
Darren Ditona
Defendant:
Colonel Roger Nutt
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Gorman v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 8:2026cv01965
Plaintiff:
Marilyn Patricia Gorman
Defendant:
Social Security Commissioner
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
