Federal Cases, Dockets, and Filings From U.S. District Courts and U.S. Courts of Appeal
Cases 4,361 - 4,370
Mallahan v. Laatsch et al
as 1:2026cv01813
Plaintiff:
Daniel Michael Mallahan
Defendant:
Michelle Laatsch and S Miller
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Gafford v. Anderson
as 5:2026cv00377
Plaintiff:
Dwayne Gafford
Defendant:
Keith A. Anderson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Auto Negligence
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2026cv03872
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2026cv06320
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2026cv06343
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2026cv04885
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 in - Habeas Corpus: INS
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2026cv06344
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Robinson v. Guerrero-Director TDCJ-CID
as 6:2026cv00646
Petitioner:
Monica Lavelle Robinson
Respondent:
Eric Guerrero-Director TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Conway v. St. Myers
as 7:2026cv00771
Plaintiff:
Atticus B. Conway
Defendant:
St. Myers
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
PRT USA Inc. v. Complete Forestry, LLC
as 1:2026cv00402
Plaintiff:
PRT USA Inc.
Defendant:
Complete Forestry, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1330 Breach of Contract
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
