Federal Cases, Dockets, and Filings From U.S. District Courts and U.S. Courts of Appeal
Cases 4,601 - 4,610
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2026cv04961
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 in - Habeas Corpus: INS
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2026cv04968
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 in - Habeas Corpus: INS
FREEMAN v. BISIGNANO
as 1:2026cv01171
Plaintiff:
CHAD IVEY FREEMAN
Defendant:
FRANK BISIGNANO
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Veney v. Federal Express Corporation
as 3:2026cv01116
Plaintiff:
Timmy Lee Veney
Defendant:
Federal Express Corporation
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2 (a) Fair Labor Standards Act
Logan v. Federal Express Corporation
as 3:2026cv01121
Plaintiff:
Marcus Logan
Defendant:
Federal Express Corporation
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2 (a) Fair Labor Standards Act
Hendricks v. Federal Express Corporation
as 3:2026cv01135
Plaintiff:
Scott Hendricks
Defendant:
Federal Express Corporation
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2 (a) Fair Labor Standards Act
Crafton et al v. The Gap, Inc.
as 6:2026cv02316
Plaintiff:
Nancy Crafton and Raekesha Moore Smith
Defendant:
The Gap, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Deceptive Trade Practices
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2026cv05736
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Race)
Gonzalez v. Walton-Ellis et al
as 3:2026cv00776
Plaintiff:
John F. Gonzalez
Defendant:
Walton-Ellis, Choi, Oakman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Morton v. Winston Industries, LLC
as 1:2026cv00291
Plaintiff:
Joshua Morton
Defendant:
Winston Industries, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.