Federal Cases, Dockets, and Filings From U.S. District Courts and U.S. Courts of Appeal
Cases 4,641 - 4,650
Lane v. Leake et al
as 3:2026cv00126
Plaintiff:
Robert Lane
Defendant:
Deputy Logan Leake, Berkeley County Sheriffs and Martinsburg Police Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Raschella v. Federal Express Corporation et al
as 1:2026cv00147
Plaintiff:
Mark Raschella
Defendant:
Federal Express Corporation and FedEx Ground Package System, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Stevenson v. Federal Express Corporation
as 2:2026cv01087
Plaintiff:
Sean Stevenson
Defendant:
Federal Express Corporation
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2 (a) Fair Labor Standards Act
James v. Federal Express Corporation
as 8:2026cv04196
Plaintiff:
Keith James
Defendant:
Federal Express Corporation
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2026cv01263
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2026cv00180
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Wilkerson v. SSA
as 3:2026cv00078
Plaintiff:
Denise Wilkerson
Defendant:
Commissioner of SSA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
v. Smith et al
as 3:2026cv00840
Defendant:
Suzanne Smith and Piedmont Airlines Inc.
Cause Of Action: Diversity - Notice of Removal
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2026cv08205
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Credle v. Federal Express Corporation
as 2:2026cv01090
Plaintiff:
Markell Credle
Defendant:
Federal Express Corporation
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2 (a) Fair Labor Standards Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
