Federal Cases, Dockets, and Filings From U.S. District Courts and U.S. Courts of Appeal
Cases 4,661 - 4,670
Ibekie v. United States of America
as 1:2026cv12201
Petitioner:
Anthony Ibekie
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Remedies on motion attacking sentence
Wilson v. Whittington
as 5:2026cv04475
Petitioner:
Jake Antonio Wilson
Respondent:
Warden Whittington
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Lance v. Anderson et al
as 5:2026cv04473
Plaintiff:
Jacob Nathaniel Lance
Defendant:
Joel Anderson, Curtis Earley, Joseph Werts and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights, State Filers
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2026cv07242
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2026cv08765
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Skinner v. City Of New York et al
as 1:2026cv08810
Plaintiff:
Jared J. Skinner
Defendant:
City Of New York, John Doe, Andrew Naufon and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Dixon v. The City of Peekskill et al
as 1:2026cv08840
Plaintiff:
Gregory Dixon
Defendant:
The City of Peekskill and Officer John Doe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
(PC) Amesquita v. Anderson
as 2:2026cv03503
Plaintiff:
Julio Amesquita
Defendant:
Anderson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
HYATT v. CAPUTO et al
as 1:2026cv03505
Defendant:
MICHAEL R. CAPUTO doing business as MICHAEL CAPUTO PUBLIC RELATIONS, MICHAEL CAPUTO PUBLIC RELATIONS, JONN KEAMY and others
Plaintiff:
GILBERT P. HYATT
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
WRIGHT v. USA
as 1:2026cv01183
Petitioner:
DELQUAN MONZELL WRIGHT
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
