Federal Cases, Dockets, and Filings From U.S. District Courts and U.S. Courts of Appeal
Cases 5,061 - 5,070
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2026cv00334
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
v. Wilkerson et al
as 2:2026cv03297
Defendant:
Ryan Wilkerson and Magnolia Circle, LLC
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
BRASFIELD v. NOVO NORDISK INC., et al
as 2:2026cv07697
Plaintiff:
CANDACE BRASFIELD
Defendant:
NOVO NORDISK INC., and NOVO NORDISK A/S
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
JOHNSON v. WASHINGTON COUNTY, PA
as 2:2026cv02184
Plaintiff:
WILLIE CHARLES JOHNSON, JR
Defendant:
WASHINGTON COUNTY, PA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Veliz v. Self-Esteem Seminars, L.P.
as 2:2026cv11689
Plaintiff:
Rebecca Veliz
Defendant:
Self-Esteem Seminars, L.P.
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2026cv01795
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Gray v. Travelers Personal Insurance Company
as 1:2026cv00205
Plaintiff:
Trevor Gray
Defendant:
Travelers Personal Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity of citizenship
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2026cv00438
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451 Employment Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2026cv01261
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Participant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2026cv01262
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Participant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
