Federal Cases, Dockets, and Filings From U.S. District Courts and U.S. Courts of Appeal
Cases 571 - 580
Trout v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 3:2026cv02196
Plaintiff:
Christopher R. Trout
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2026cv03569
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Brannon v. Federal Express Corporation
as 2:2026cv02126
Plaintiff:
Angela Brannon
Defendant:
Federal Express Corporation
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2026cv06331
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Innovation Labs, Inc v. Azelis Americas, LLC
as 3:2026cv01875
Plaintiff:
Innovation Labs, Inc.
Defendant:
Azelis Americas, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Thurlow v. Federal Express Corporation
as 3:2026cv01877
Plaintiff:
Harry W. Thurlow
Defendant:
Federal Express Corporation
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Denial of Overtime Compensation
Trzcinski v. Federal Express Corporation
as 3:2026cv01878
Plaintiff:
Mark Richard Trzcinski
Defendant:
Federal Express Corporation
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Denial of Overtime Compensation
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2026cv03162
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Sex)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2026cv03244
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2026cv03228
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Americans with Disabilities Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
