Federal Cases, Dockets, and Filings From U.S. District Courts and U.S. Courts of Appeal
Cases 5,881 - 5,890
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2026cv08388
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 8 U.S.C. § 1105 (a) Aliens: Habeas Corpus to Release INS Detainee
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2026cv08394
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 8 U.S.C. § 1105 (a) Aliens: Habeas Corpus to Release INS Detainee
(PC) Bonilla v. Unknown
as 2:2026cv03561
Plaintiff:
Steven Wayne Bonilla, VEXATIOUS LITIGANT
Defendant:
Unknown
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hall v. Federal Express Corporation
as 1:2026cv00269
Plaintiff:
David Hall
Defendant:
Federal Express Corporation
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Box v. Federal Express Corporation
as 3:2026cv00315
Plaintiff:
Antonia Box
Defendant:
Federal Express Corporation
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Jefferson v. Federal Express Corporation
as 1:2026cv00236
Plaintiff:
Tyrone Jefferson
Defendant:
Federal Express Corporation
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Parker v. Federal Express Corporation
as 4:2026cv00197
Plaintiff:
Roderick Parker
Defendant:
Federal Express Corporation
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Denial of Overtime Compensation
Young v. Eric Gonzalez et al.
as 1:2026cv00885
Plaintiff:
Ariel Young
Defendant:
Eric Gonzalez et al.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2026cv08354
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 8 U.S.C. § 1105 (a) Aliens: Habeas Corpus to Release INS Detainee
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2026cv01784
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
