Federal Cases, Dockets, and Filings From U.S. District Courts and U.S. Courts of Appeal
Cases 8,191 - 8,200
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2026cv04766
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
United States of America for the Use and Benefit of Lyndon Steel Company, LLC v. Pacific Indemnity Company
as 26-2352
Plaintiff:
United States of America for the Use and Benefit of LYNDON STEEL COMPANY, LLC
Defendant:
PACIFIC INDEMNITY COMPANY, LIBERTY MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY and E.W. HOWELL CO., LLC
Grossman v. Lowes Home Centers, LLC
as 26-2348
Plaintiff:
TONIANN GROSSMAN
Defendant:
LOWES HOME CENTERS, LLC
Cruz Garcia v. Blanche
as 26-2355
Petitioner:
JOSE JUAN CRUZ GARCIA
Respondent:
TODD BLANCHE, UNITED STATES ATTORNEY GENERAL
Burns v. Kauffman
as 26-2347
Plaintiff:
GEORGE E. BURNS
Defendant:
KENNETH KAUFFMAN, County Law 18TB Lawyer
Abdullah v. Katehis et al
as 1:2026cv07100
Plaintiff:
Abdul H. Abdullah
Defendant:
Police Officer John Katehis, Police Officer Aqib Khan, Sergant Louis Wirth and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2026cv07097
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12188 Americans With Disabilities Act - Civil Enforcement Actions
Smith v. Pytlik et al
as 2:2026cv01427
Plaintiff:
Keith Quintarius Smith
Defendant:
Tyler Pytlik and Wauwatosa Police Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
(HC) Poslof v. On Habeas Corpus
as 1:2026cv06642
Petitioner:
Lonnie Lee Poslof, Jr.
Respondent:
On Habeas Corpus
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2026cv06656
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 8 U.S.C. § 1105 (a) Aliens: Habeas Corpus to Release INS Detainee
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
