Federal Cases, Dockets, and Filings From U.S. District Courts and U.S. Courts of Appeal
Cases 8,161 - 8,170
Arnold v. Tinkle
as 1:2026cv05705
Defendant:
Christopher Tinkle
Plaintiff:
Shawn Arnold
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2026cv01364
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Race)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2026cv03226
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (IMMIGRATION)
Doe v. Does, 1-50 et al
as 1:2026cv00826
Defendant:
The Roman Catholic Bishop of Providence, Bruce A. Lewandowski, Church of Our Lady of Lourdes and others
Plaintiff:
John Doe
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
Guffin v. Lindseth, JR. et al
as 2:2026cv03473
Defendant:
Roundtree and Associates INC, Cedarhill Operating Company, L.L.C., David Walker and others
Plaintiff:
Elina Guffin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2026cv01022
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Sex)
S.N.A. v. G6 Hospitality Property LLC
as 9:2026cv00967
Defendant:
G6 Hospitality Property LLC
Plaintiff:
S.N.A.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Maggard v. United States of America
as 2:2026cv00266
Defendant:
United States of America
Plaintiff:
Mr. Larry Maggard
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346 Tort Claim
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2026cv07013
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Gye-Jacquot v. King et al
as 6:2026cv00141
Defendant:
Ryan P. Hayes and Britten Renee King
Plaintiff:
Vincent Gye-Jacquot
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 21
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
