Federal Cases, Dockets, and Filings From U.S. District Courts and U.S. Courts of Appeal
Cases 9,561 - 9,570
Mesa Underwriters Specialty Insurance Company
as 3:2026cv06008
Plaintiff:
Mesa Underwriters Specialty Insurance Company
Defendant:
i5 Distribution Inc. and William Kelly Courser, Jr.
Cause Of Action: No cause code entered
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2026cv03183
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2026cv06003
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Hardison v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 2:2026cv03182
Plaintiff:
Anthony Hardison
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Interested Party:
Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 416 Denial of Social Security Benefits
Kulp v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 3:2026cv06006
Plaintiff:
Chelsea Kulp
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 416 Denial of Social Security Benefits
United States of America v. Thomas
as 2:2026cv06321
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Paul J Thomas
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 7402 Refund of Taxes
Young, Jr. v. Credence Resource Management, LLC
as 5:2026cv05130
Plaintiff:
Lawrence Edward Young, Jr.
Defendant:
Credence Resource Management, LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2026cv14086
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 8 U.S.C. § 1105 (a) Aliens: Habeas Corpus to Release INS Det
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2026cv14087
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
