Federal Cases, Dockets, and Filings From U.S. District Courts and U.S. Courts of Appeal
Cases 9,541 - 9,550
Federal Trade Commission v. Credit Glory, LLC, et al.
as 26-7370
Defendant:
LIAM PAVEL TAME TE AMORANGI TIRA EMERY, DAVID NAYLOR, in their individual and corporate capacities, JOSHUA CURTIS and others
Plaintiff:
FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION
Caraffa, et al. v. Thornell, et al.
as 26-7382
Defendant:
COUNTY OF MARICOPA, UNKNOWN PARTIES, Superior Court Judges in CR2019-155732-001DT Criminal Offense, ARIZONA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS REHABILITATION AND REENTRY and others
Plaintiff:
KELLY BOLOGOIA, #54707, DANIEL GALLEGOS, #330655, NORBERT MANYGOATS, #181982 and others
Hughes v. Mid-Century Insurance Company
as 26-7377
Defendant:
MID-CENTURY INSURANCE COMPANY
Plaintiff:
JACQUELYN M. HUGHES, ATTORNEY
United States of America v. Hanzas
as 26-3185
Intervenor:
VERMONT PUBLIC INTEREST RESEARCH GROUP, MARY ANDREWS, RICHARD MONTEROSSO and others
Defendant:
SARAH COPELAND HANZAS, in her official capacity as Secretary of State of Vermont
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 26-3187
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
El v. JP Morgan Chase Lien #212607100490613/FDIC Federal Deposit Insurance Company
as 26-3188
Defendant:
MARGARET RILEY, LUKE WOODARD, NICK STANESCU, Fiduciary/Agent and others
Plaintiff:
Trustee AUSAR WANEPHER MAAT EL, Allodial American Revocable Living Trust Patent Pursuant to FRCP 69, 56, also Article 6th U.S.C.
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 26-3190
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Curtis-Shanley
as 26-7378
Real Party In Interest:
COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO
Petitioner:
IAIN CURTIS-SHANLEY
Respondent:
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, RIVERSIDE
Pierre v. Pelayes, et al.
as 26-7371
Defendant:
DOES, 1-25, inclusive and TRISTAN PELAYES, an individual
Plaintiff:
DONALD RAY PIERRE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
