Federal Cases, Dockets, and Filings From U.S. District Courts and U.S. Courts of Appeal
Cases 9,741 - 9,750
Edwards v. Federal Express Corp.
as 2:2026cv03118
Plaintiff:
Trevor Edwards
Defendant:
Federal Express Corporation
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2 (a) Fair Labor Standards Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2026cv04261
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 in - Habeas Corpus: INS
(HC) Castro Jaquez v. Ocasio et al
as 1:2026cv07272
Plaintiff:
Vincent Castro Jaquez
Defendant:
Ocasio, Solorio, Garza and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(PC) Adams v. Covello
as 1:2026cv07282
Plaintiff:
Frank Adams, III
Defendant:
Patrick Covello
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Taylor v. Gentle et al
as 1:2026cv07923
Plaintiff:
Tad W. Taylor
Defendant:
Mr. Edgar C. Gentle, III and Kroll Restructuring Administration
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 7:2026cv07851
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 706 (a) Writ of Mandamus
Wao, Aphline v. Madison Police Department et al
as 3:2026cv00943
Plaintiff:
Aphline Wao
Defendant:
Madison Police Department, Fitchburg Police Department and Dane County Jail
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Laszcz v. Federal Express Corporation
as 3:2026cv05163
Plaintiff:
Marc Laszcz
Defendant:
Federal Express Corporation
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 0201 fl FLSA: Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA)
Kenneth Gray v. City of Claremont et al
as 2:2026cv09770
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Gray
Defendant:
City of Claremont and Does 1-10, inclusive
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2026cv05234
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
