Federal Cases, Dockets, and Filings From U.S. District Courts and U.S. Courts of Appeal
Cases 1 - 10 of 208,672
LS 534 v. Uber Technologies, Inc. et al
as 3:2024cv07142
Defendant:
Uber Technologies, Inc., Rasier-CA, LLC and Rasier, LLC
Plaintiff:
Jane Doe LS 534
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv08815
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv08814
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv02902
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00180
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 0794 Job Discrimination (Handicap)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv23944
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv23945
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
v. M/V Louisiane
as 3:2024cv01054
Plaintiff:
Greater Nevada Credit Union
Defendant:
M/V Louisiane
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Lazcano v. AFAM Concept Inc. et al
as 1:2024cv10041
Defendant:
AFAM Concept Inc., Loreal USA Products, Inc., SoftSheen Carson and others
Plaintiff:
Leonor Lazcano
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Briggman v. Loreal USA Inc et al
as 1:2024cv10042
Defendant:
Loreal USA Inc, Loreal USA Products, Inc. and SoftSheen Carson
Plaintiff:
Geneva Briggman
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
