Federal Cases, Dockets, and Filings From U.S. District Courts and U.S. Courts of Appeal
Cases 1,531 - 1,540
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2026cv05226
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e-2sh Job Discrimination (Sexual Harassment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2026cv05245
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity Action
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2026cv05225
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Reynolds v. Kalshi Inc. et al
as 1:2026cv05238
Plaintiff:
Ian Reynolds
Defendant:
Kalshi Inc., KalshiEX LLC, Kalshi Klear Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 ds Diversity-Contract Dispute
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2026cv03741
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1201 Civil Rights (Disability)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2026cv03728
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2026cv03752
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2026cv03757
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
Melgar v. Garzon & Bernal Design Inc. et al
as 2:2026cv03737
Plaintiff:
Carlos Melgar
Defendant:
Garzon & Bernal Design Inc. and Miguel Garzon
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Denial of Overtime Compensation
Riverhead Surgery, PC v. Cigna Health and Life Insurance Company
as 1:2026cv03742
Plaintiff:
Riverhead Surgery, PC
Defendant:
Cigna Health and Life Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
