Federal Cases, Dockets, and Filings From U.S. District Courts and U.S. Courts of Appeal
Cases 2,921 - 2,930
Deon Colvin v. Anna Balckburne-Rigsby, et al
as 26-7134
Plaintiff:
Deon D. Colvin
Defendant:
Anna Balckburne-Rigsby, Corinne A. Beckwith, Catherine F. Easterly and others
Avago Technologies International Sales Pte. Limit v. Netflix, Inc.
as 26-1986
Appellant:
AVAGO TECHNOLOGIES INTERNATIONAL SALES PTE. LIMITED
Appellee:
NETFLIX, INC.
American United Life Insurance Company v. Wilson et al
as 2:2026cv01116
Plaintiff:
American United Life Insurance Company
Defendant:
Peter Ray Wilson, Jr, G.W., James F West and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Interpleader Action
Lopez v. 47 Brand LLC et al
as 5:2026cv01115
Plaintiff:
Omar Antonio Lopez
Defendant:
47 Brand LLC, New Era Cap Co and Club Forty7
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Huntington Distribution Finance, Inc. v. Tri County Properties, LLC et al
as 1:2026cv00236
Plaintiff:
Huntington Distribution Finance, Inc.
Defendant:
Tri County Properties, LLC and Michael Glen Dean
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
McKenzie v. City of Clanton Police Department (INMATE 2)
as 2:2026cv00530
Plaintiff:
Marvin McKenzie
Defendant:
City of Clanton Police Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Reed v. Pike County Sheriff's Office et al (MAG+)
as 2:2026cv00533
Plaintiff:
Terry M. Reed
Defendant:
Pike County Sheriff's Office, Russell Thomas, Pike County Commission and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Smith v. Zener et al
as 3:2026cv00246
Plaintiff:
Jeremy Lee Smith
Defendant:
Zener, Zeek and Dept of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Reid v. Bradley
as 4:2026cv00642
Plaintiff:
Robin Reid
Defendant:
Joe Bradley
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Personal Injury
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
