Federal Cases, Dockets, and Filings From U.S. District Courts and U.S. Courts of Appeal
Cases 6,841 - 6,850
Huaute v. Federal Express Corporation
as 2:2026cv00708
Plaintiff:
Storm Huaute
Defendant:
Federal Express Corporation
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2026cv00427
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal - Fair Credit Reporti
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2026cv02387
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
BROWN-ROUSE v. PETERKIN et al
as 1:2026cv01236
Plaintiff:
JAVORIUS BROWN-ROUSE
Defendant:
JEFFERY PETERKIN and KIMBERLY FREEMAN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Reagan v. Jones et al
as 3:2026cv03645
Plaintiff:
Darren L Reagan
Defendant:
Thomas G Jones, John F Warren, Pauline Medrano and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Mullins v. Bickham
as 3:2026cv01190
Plaintiff:
Cecil James Mullins, Jr.
Defendant:
Keith Bickham
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2026cv07126
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Watkins v. Federal Express Corporation
as 5:2026cv00153
Plaintiff:
Rhaphel Watkins
Defendant:
Federal Express Corporation
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Whetzel v. Federal Express Corporation
as 5:2026cv00154
Plaintiff:
Travis Whetzel
Defendant:
Federal Express Corporation
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2026cv03672
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
