Federal Cases, Dockets, and Filings From U.S. District Courts and U.S. Courts of Appeal
Cases 7,141 - 7,150
BROOKS v. NOVO NORDISK A/S et al
as 2:2026cv05707
Plaintiff:
MESHA BROOKS
Defendant:
NOVO NORDISK A/S and NOVO NORDISK INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2026cv05706
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Race)
BROWNE v. USA
as 1:2026cv01147
Plaintiff:
JAYMAR BROWNE
Defendant:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1491 Tucker Act
Timeless Enterprises Inc. v. United States
as 1:2026cv03544
Plaintiff:
Timeless Enterprises Inc.
Defendant:
United States of America, U.S. Customs & Border Protection and Rodney Scott, Commissioner of U.S. Customs and Border Protection
Flexfab, LLC v. United States et al
as 1:2026cv03545
Plaintiff:
Flexfab, LLC
Defendant:
U.S. Customs & Border Protection, United States of America and Commissioner Rodney S. Scott
Stoltey v. County of San Diego et al
as 3:2026cv04568
Plaintiff:
Robert Paul Stoltey
Defendant:
County of San Diego, Matthew G. Milke and Does 1 through 20
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 cvp Civil Rights (Personal Property)
Morales v. Bisignano
as 3:2026cv04563
Plaintiff:
Cesar Morales
Defendant:
Frank Bisignano
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 0405 id Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Vallely v. Restaurant Depot, LLC
as 1:2026cv04880
Plaintiff:
Arthur Vallely, III
Defendant:
Restaurant Depot, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Other Contract
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2026cv04876
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Mendez v. El Charro Bakery 1 Corp. et al
as 1:2026cv04862
Plaintiff:
Paula Mendez
Defendant:
El Charro Bakery 1 Corp., El Charro Bakery II Corp. and Antonio Aquino Vasquez
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Denial of Overtime Compensation
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
