Federal Cases, Dockets, and Filings From U.S. District Courts and U.S. Courts of Appeal
Cases 7,151 - 7,160
Tanaka v. New Mexico Department of Vocational Rehabilitation el al.
as 1:2026cv03601
Plaintiff:
Carolyn Tanaka
Defendant:
New Mexico Department of Vocational Rehabilitation, Cara Benta and Anita Sanchez
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Mcclain v. Social Security Administration
as 2:2026cv03595
Plaintiff:
Brandy Lee Mcclain
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Baez v. The Ryl Company LLC
as 2:2026cv03657
Plaintiff:
Emmanuel Baez
Defendant:
The Ryl Company LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Fraud
Dunn v. Caldera Medical, Inc.
as 3:2026cv03750
Plaintiff:
Allyson Dunn
Defendant:
Caldera Medical, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Herlihy v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 6:2026cv07144
Plaintiff:
Krystal Alice Herlihy
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Young v. U.S. Aviation Academy
as 1:2026cv02445
Plaintiff:
Kaitlin D. Young
Defendant:
U.S. Aviation Academy
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Notice of Removal
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2026cv02443
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2026cv00835
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Brown v. Briggs
as 5:2026ct03325
Plaintiff:
Nykeshia Brown
Defendant:
Officer Briggs
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ermilio et al v. Safeco Insurance Company of America
as 1:2026cv03166
Plaintiff:
Jordan Ermilio and Laarnie Ermilio
Defendant:
Safeco Insurance Company of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
